Would you like to guess the percentage of the participants in the second group who solved the puzzle correctly? In the early s, a psychologist named J. Leftoid masochists and the Christian meek call for returning Hawaii to the Hawaiians and capitulating before a massive Mexican reconquista of one-third of America.
It was an appealing and apparently convincing message. Their main endeavor has been to enforce their compulsory e. However, even that great moral abyss of Western civilization — the Holocausts — stands out more in its industrialized and organizational features than it does either in the quality of its hatefulness or its relative or even absolute volumes.
Is it more humane to go by a stroke of a blunt machete than by a whiff of Zyklon B? Management consultants in the s and s even used this puzzle when making sales pitches to prospective clients. The idea went viral via s-era media and word of mouth, of course. Inscription on the back in German: But the Holocausts do not prove that Whites are worse than other people, just that they are no better.
The essay below is the conclusion of the ninth part in a series by Takuan Seiyo. That this advice is useless when actually trying to solve a problem involving a real box should effectively have killed off the much widely disseminated—and therefore, much more dangerous—metaphor that out-of-the-box thinking spurs creativity.
The symmetry, the beautiful simplicity of the solution, and the fact that 80 percent of the participants were effectively blinded by the boundaries of the square led Guilford and the readers of his books to leap to the sweeping conclusion that creativity requires you to go outside the box.
The history of the Third Reich also proves that with the right formula of economic blowup, misery and humiliation, sparked by charismatic evil, no people are immune to such horror, at no time. Equality psychos are tearing down the most egalitarian society that ever existed except for initial communist experiments, before they turned bloody.
There seemed to be no end to the insights that could be offered under the banner of thinking outside the box. But you will find numerous situations where a creative breakthrough is staring you in the face. Indeed, the concept enjoyed such strong popularity and intuitive appeal that no one bothered to check the facts.
That is, direct and explicit instructions to think outside the box did not help. K and discretionary e. Instead, aggressive White androphobes of all genders which I can no longer count are decimating the philogynous and egalitarian West. In relative numbers, in just one year,the Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda, killed off a total of one million, in a population of 7 million.
No one, that is, before two different research teams —Clarke Burnham with Kenneth Davis, and Joseph Alba with Robert Weisberg—ran another experiment using the same puzzle but a different research procedure.
Today many people are familiar with this puzzle and its solution. The correct solution, however, requires you to draw lines that extend beyond the area defined by the dots. Because the solution is, in hindsight, deceptively simple, clients tended to admit they should have thought of it themselves.
Speakers, trainers, training program developers, organizational consultants, and university professors all had much to say about the vast benefits of outside-the-box thinking.
More new posts will be added below this one.
In other words, the difference could easily be due to what statisticians call sampling error. Solving this problem requires people to literally think outside the box.After being taken down twice by Blogger within a single week, we got the message: It’s Time To Go. Gates of Vienna has moved to a new address.
Thinking Outside the Box: A Misguided Idea The truth behind the universal, but flawed, catchphrase for creativity. Posted Feb 06,Download